An idea about how to reduce Flooding, Multi kick and Group chat

if mig adds some new rules it would be helpful to reduce troubles of chat rooms :

1) to reduce flood : no one will be able to write same sentences(about 5 words) within 10 seconds.

2) to reduce multi kicking : starting a vote and supporting a vote both will cost credits.

3) to avoid group chats : mig can add an option, where someone will be able to use the option- enable or disable group chat.
if someone sets disable option then no one will be able
to invite him in a group chat.

it would be helpfull for admins to avoid unwanted group chats.

Good idea Soul

Ok from my view of point the First is look fine.

But the second point i dont agree bec it is so cost to user. Even the supporter vote also cost , so no one want to support vote

for the third point no need this option bec now aday admin/simple user can leave group chat if they dont like or just set id offline status .

How about other ???

Thanks for sharing idea

Not bad soul. Though some of the pointers can be considered difficult too. Other than that, it's all good

Pink-jasmine you told that if any supporting vote costs credit then no one will support. . . .

its ok cause to kick a flooder or abuser there are many admins now including newly selected admins user kick is not necessary now a day. you have to sacrifice small things to get good things. . . .

you told that if anyone does not like group chat he can leave the group easily. . . .
but what about it - if any admin faces 10-20 group chats at a time. . . . so they often use offline. . . if they could disable group chats we could find them more and more online. . . . . . . .

golden_soul_ wrote:

if mig adds some new rules it would be helpful to reduce troubles of chat rooms :

3) to avoid group chats : mig can add an option, where someone will be able to use the option- enable or disable group chat.
if someone sets disable option then no one will be able
to invite him in a group chat.

it would be helpfull for admins to avoid unwanted group chats.

its really cool idea... hope i see this soon..

Bro i think some of those ideas are great.

golden_soul_ wrote:

Pink-jasmine you told that if any supporting vote costs credit then no one will support. . . .

its ok cause to kick a flooder or abuser there are many admins now including newly selected admins user kick is not necessary now a day. you have to sacrifice small things to get good things. . . .

how many people on mig now actually do have credit? Not all of us have 50usernames or hundreds which we can turn to. I think the mig33 team would have made a mistake once more by implementing that method.
On the other hand also putting an even bigger strain on the current admins, you might say they are 'many' but they are not enough. Remember we are also millions of users, and they are not even 0.01% of our total. Be logical bro, lets not focus on ourselves only, admins are human too.

Nice thinking bro

golden_soul_ wrote:

if mig adds some new rules it would be helpful to reduce troubles of chat rooms :

1) to reduce flood : no one will be able to write same sentences(about 5 words) within 10 seconds.

3) to avoid group chats : mig can add an option, where someone will be able to use the option- enable or disable group chat.
if someone sets disable option then no one will be able
to invite him in a group chat.

it would be helpfull for admins to avoid unwanted group chats.

agree with your points bro.....you should also send your these ideas to mig33....

golden_soul_ wrote:

2) to reduce multi kicking :supporting a vote both will cost credits.

it will be a very good business for mig33 but m not agree with u in this point.....it will be very bad if it cost credits for supporting the votes.....no1 will kick the absuers if it happens...

by the way your ideas are awesome carry on my bro....

What will you do if 10 of your friend enter in room within 10sec? you will not wc them?

What will you do if 10 user give you salam within 10sec? You will not answer them?
There're many things like that we need to write repeatedly that's why mig33 let you send same text repeatedly. And i think you forget about the old system of mig33 where the system was nobody could send same text twice within 5sec.
Mig33 now updated and its working good to stop flooding in rooms.

If everybody need money to kick a slanger how it could be a good idea to decrease abuse? It'll be helpful for the abusers to abuse more freely because nobody will kick for money.

Anyway bro.. Thanks for your idea.

happy,you are right...by the way,nice idea golden...it indicates how devoted everyone is to get problem solved...keep it up buddies

I agree with u goldy. Phen i also think goldy shuld mail ths thoughts to mig...... We all need a quick fast solution...